Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/201/34 Definition of Evidence The case against the accused was based on extra-judicial confession in which the accused's canal was recovered. Additional judicial confession identifying the presence of an accused and the recovery of blood-stained clothing was allegedly presented to a prosecutor's witness, especially during his inspection at any time during his inspection. 34 was never placed under the provisions of 342. , CCP Such extra-judicial confession cannot be used against a co-accused; additional judicial confession was allegedly made by one of the accused, it cannot be used against the accused as it was weak evidence, Because it has been said that additional judicial confessions did not disclose in any detail or style or form in which the deceased was executed, it has been alleged that the extra-judicial confession was due to risk and pressure. The accused cannot be admitted on such poor evidence as evidence in connection with the recovery of the body, the identification of the incident and the recovery of the stained blood from the deceased, is also contradictory evidence of the testimony of the two stars. The prosecution faced numerous contradictions and reforms that further damaged litigation against the prosecution, which failed to prove the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the defendant's conviction and sentence were set aside. And was acquitted of the crimes imposed on them. best law firms from Village Sunder lawyer