Section 7 (h) Pakistan Arms Ordinance (X-X of 1965), Section 13A (1) (c) terrorist acts, seizure of weapons and rockets, etc. Testimonies of evidence were presented to the police encounter suspect before he was accused of high court scope. During the police encounter, the suspect allegedly had a hand grenade and a rifle at the time of his arrest, the trial court convicted under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 and Section 13A (1) (C) of Pakistan Arms. Was heard. Ordinance, 1965 Appeal filed by the accused before the High Court was also dismissed. The conviction of the accused was that they had been subjected to serious prejudice because no one had appeared before the High Court, and that they might have acted while exercising their right to self-defense. The arrest warrant was granted by the prosecution confirming the fact that the suspect was injured at the time of the arrest The defendant could not explain how he had suffered the firearms, citing the possible time of the injury. It was supported by medical evidence and the time spent by the accused police was properly defended before the trial court and every witness was examined by a defense lawyer for a long time. Thais version and only then did the trial court prosecution bring a domestic charge against the accused and the conviction recorded under it. Neither was proven independent of the situation and accordingly the appeal was dismissed.
