Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QADIR versus ABDUL KARIM

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 Section 22 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1991, R10 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 42 and 44 Civil Service Mandatory Retirement Reinstatement Power Court Ordered the execution of an order passed by the respondents of the Authority, who had retired from service in the public interest and started receiving pensions, but later in an appeal before the service tribunal. Challenged his compulsory retirement and appealed through the service tribunal after his removal, After the appeal was filed in the Supreme Court, which was rejected by the respondents of the Supreme Court, then the Prime Minister filed a petition for restoration of his service and the Prime Minister considered the request. Mandatory orders have been cleared. Defendant's retirement and his reappointment ordered by the Prime Minister's administration not implemented by the Minister, the defendant filed a constitutional petition in the High Court which the High Court accepted and prayed for the respondent in his constitutional petition The directive issued which challenged the order passed in the High Court was earlier challenged by the respondent against the compulsory retirement of the appellant who was engaged in service after the compulsory retirement of the respondents. The appeal is filed first by the service tribunal and then by the Supreme Court, for the respondent. Order retirement earth had been finalized and was not able to have any executive authority contradictory orders as the court decision property advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer