Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

EJAZ AHMED versus STATE


The mandatory procedure was laid down in section 304, despite being charged under Section 302, PPC for complying with Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 304 Law Shadad (Article 10 of 1984), Article 17, There was no trial after PPC. Determination of testimony of court and prosecution witnesses was not made in accordance with Article 17 of the Evidence Act, the statement of the accused was not legally recorded under section 342 of 1984, the trial court found the accused guilty Was not declared and no one was convicted. Section 302, three sections of the PPC but he was convicted and convicted under mere 5302; the PPC convict and the accused were kept separate under the circumstances and the case was fresh according to law. The trial court was remanded for trial.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Ubaro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.