NATIONAL INVESTMENT TRUST LTD. versus AL-QAIM TEXTILE MILLS LTD.
Sections 2 (p) and 171 smuggling of goods The confiscation of the smuggled goods and the arrest of the accused was recovered at the Export Lounge Airport carrying some packets of emerald / precious stones and foreign / local currency and seized goods through customs. The Authority was imposed and the order was challenged by the accused on two grounds, first, that as a legal notice under Section 171, the Customs Act, 1969, allowed the accused to take action against him. Was not given before, the whole decision-making building was illegal before the customs authorities; The provision of new status was exempted by the Order of Smuggling Video passed by the Customs Act of 1969, 1969. The purpose of the Customs Act 1969 was to notify those who were arrested or their property seized, Based on the nature of the nature of nature 171, nothing was either said by itself or by any other provision of the Customs Act, 1969, without any consequence. The results will explain, if strict adherence to this section is not necessary, establish that it was intended from other sources. As the basis of the seizure or arrest was also conveyed through other documents, it was alleged that he had made known the nature of his arrest and the seizure of his belongings, before the trial before the customs court. Customs authorities were not illegal The accused was not acquitted by the customs judge, but the proceedings against the accused have been canceled under 5 265 K, CRPC transferred the accused on the basis of this on request.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer