MUHAMMAD MALIK versus FAZAL KARIM
Section 497 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979) Section 17 (3) Guarantee, the accused's grant was not designated in the FIR and he was not subjected to any identification test and no The crime was not proven. At that stage, he had nothing to do with the receipt of a currency note from a third person, as the same case was to be investigated in the trial in which the accused participated in the crime. Was declared. There is no final evidence against them, the disclosure, whose value was still to be determined by the trial court case against the accused, in the circumstances, further investigation was required and accordingly they were admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Khangarh lawyer
