Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHANI versus BARKAT MASIH

Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R 11 West Pakistan Civil Rent Restrictions Ordinance (VI of 1959), Article 135 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Civil Procedure Code of CPC Plants O VII. Previously they were challenged before the High Court through a constitutional petition to remove the premises in which the tenant was disposed of in the case of a settlement between the parties entitled to receive a fixed amount from the landlord who said that the settlement. In the case under question, the tenant was acquitted instead of occupying the house, two courts for permanent injunction Under the dismissal case, it was claimed that there was a case of compromise between the parties listed earlier in the constitutional application and that the plaintiff / tenant had no case under which the coordination of the courts on the basis of the evidence. The results were retained. In the High Court review, it is observed that the tenant is extending his possession in premises i n the evidence of the High Court based on the evidence of the record, defeating the withdrawal orders passed against him. No questions were asked with, and their requests could not be interrupted which led to the dismissal of the appeal attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chaghi lawyer