Find a Lawyer

REHMAT JAN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PESHAWAR

Section 42 and 45 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI Of 1887), Section 5 (C) North West Frontier Province Tenancy Act (XXV Of 1950), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 ( 3) The tenants of the tenancy of the tenancy in the Revenue Record who claim the rights of occupancy in respect of the land in dispute under the provisions of section 5 (c) of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 and the Hazara Tenancy Regulation, 1987. Had claimed that the introduction of the Northwest Frontier Act, 1950, under which the tenancy rights were changed to ownership, had the advantage Was denied to the applicants, claiming that the tenants' right to occupy the land in dispute over a dispute between the professionals in accordance with the agreement reached in 1905. The applicants and the adjoining land holders have already submitted to the applicant on the basis of the decree passed in 1905 and the legal privileges granted by the N. The Arthur West Frontier Provincial Tenancy Act, 1950 was not included in the Revenue Record, the applicant first raised the matter before the Civil Court and then the Revenue Authority, but eventually his claim was rejected by the Board of Revenue on a threshold basis. Which the High Court upheld further. Was it unusual that the petitioners' forefathers had sold significant portions of the land over time on various occasions, despite receiving a compromise and serious competition for their rights and success? Applicants or any of their predecessors jobs for advocates from Kotri lawyer