NATIONAL INVESTMENT TRUST LTD. versus AL-QAIM TEXTILE MILLS LTD.
Sections 178 and 179 Election of Directors The legitimate applicant had sent a notice of his intention to present his representative for selection as Director and was welcomed over time. The name of the applicant's representative was excluded from the election on the basis that there was no agreement with the company applicant to take any of his representatives as the number of candidates selected from one of the elected board of directors' constituencies. Equivalent to the number of directors selected so there was no election Applicant was not less than 20% Section 179, Companies Ordinance, 1984 Shares ban, applied in case of election irregularities and not in accordance with law. Not because members effectively exercise their right to vote Rennes were stopped, action directors election were directed to respondents illegal to hold a general meeting for election of Board of Directors members according to law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Pasni lawyer