Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD URS versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, THATA

Section 2 (2) of the Evacuating Property and Displaced Persons Act (repealed) Act, 1975 Claims (Vacant Property) Regulations (MLR No. 89 of 1991), paras 8 and 9 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) , Article 199 In order to maintain the constitutional application of the effect of the evacuation of the vacant land, the applicants claimed that they had purchased the land allotted to the claimants (respondents) in the dispute by the Allies. And the defendant claimed that the land was originally allotted to the claimant as a vacancy, but the said MLR 89191 surrendered in the same way. And did not choose to purchase the land of the other respondents but after surrendering through the original allottee, the status of the land changed from vacant to surrendered land, which became the property of the provincial government. Also could not be allotted. The plaintiffs' defendants but they had to be resolved by the Revenue Officers was a matter pending before the Civil Court Mate in the dispute. In fact, the questions originally involved, most importantly, were whether the original claimants were allotted disputed land. It was handed over, and after that, it was handed over to the provincial government, the second important question was if it was also established that the land was legally allotted in the dispute. On the basis of the withdrawal of the claimant's respondents whether it was said that the allotment is forged on the basis that it was stated that the respondents had already settled their claim of eviction on another property of fact. Such questions need evidence immigration advocates contact from Chaghi lawyer