MANDVIWALLA ENTERTAINMENT (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KARACHI SOUTH
Motion Pictures Ordinance 1979 Section 13 (4) Increases entry rates for public display of thick picture living in motion picture business in Cantonment Cinematographic Rules, 1985, R24 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Arts 18 and 1993 Constitutional application. As a distributor, a motion picture was imported and it allowed the administration to increase the entry rate, saying that motion picture was the most expensive in the history of motion pictures and that motion picture non-motion Only two shows are shown due to normal running time of the week. The applicant's request was rejected on the technical grounds that the applicant was not licensed, in any case, at admission rates. Could not ask for any increase, could not legally exclude the constitutional application on the basis that the petition Was busy. No Authority License, when the Authority has the authority to increase the admission rate, which is under Canton's R24, granted NINMA Cinematographic Rules, 1985 the power to set admission rates in consultation with Pakistani film exhibitors. The association had periodically allowed admission rates to rise for this purpose, filed by cinema management within the authority limits. The mere technical authority was not founded on any justified principle of justice, justice and justice, but it was a tremendous exercise of authority authorized by the fact that it involved a very valuable fundamental right. As Article 18 of the Constitution guarantees. Pakistan (1973), the right to run any legal business or business
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer