Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHAN versus ZAHIR HUSSAIN SHAH

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 514 Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Appeal to Section 302 Supreme Court of Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Arrest of the accused under Section 42 Section 302, During the course of the trial, the trial court issued notices to the trial court, in the amount of Rs. 1,50,000 with two guarantees granted to the PPC, necessary action. After the amount was reduced and the bailiffs were directed to file a prosecution appeal. The court, which was dismissed for jurisdiction, filed the appeal before the Shariah court, the legal heir of the victim, in which the appeal was accepted and the bailiffs ordered to pay Rs. 100,000 and Rs. 15,000 respectively. Before the Shariah court was banned, the Shariat court refused to delay the Supreme Court's bail while implementing bail bonds, delaying its excellent strategy through the forum below. Couldn't reopen or bother with. E and will be well aware of the fact that in the absence of a conviction or fugitive of the accused, he will be liable to pay the amount mentioned in the Bail Bond, with the trial court approving the bail in this regard. He took a very gentle approach to the issue of money recovery. On bail, which was a sarcastic tendency to defile the judicial system, the Supreme Court dismissed the circumstances. best law firm from Shorkot lawyer