Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus MUHAMMAD KHAN

In the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Parade Prices Act 1993 Section 4 Pre-Right, Wendy, in his written statement, made a special plea that the plaintiff / pre-emptor waived his right to a retraction because the defendant defendant Had a contract with the defendant. According to the vendor, after receiving Rs 10,000 from the seller, it has been claimed that he will withdraw from his earlier right to copyright and sell the pledge taken by the vendor in his written statement regarding the waiver. No claim was filed by the plaintiff / professional for furnishing a copy of the former Caliph nor any copy for receipt of such claim by the plaintiff / pre-emptor receiving Rs. 10,000 The fact of the matter was that he was reluctant to file a case for pre-arrest in lieu of this, otherwise, the accused was proved and proved by the parties to the evidence. In the jirga, the plaintiff / pre-importer explicitly waived his previous authorization by accepting the position that he was not ready to buy the suit property on the money demanded by the shopkeeper because he is a poor man. Was not allowed to file a pre-emption suit before accepting a sum of Rs. 10,000 before the vendor; the results of the consolidation of the courts below were clearly established by the pre-emptor / plaintiff. Was, in this respect, not to be interfered with solicitors from Tharo Shah lawyer