Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN

Civil Code of Civil Regulations 1908 Sections 42 and 54 (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) of the lawsuit and the filing of a permanent injunction / the defendant is allegedly given his favor. Claims to own a home in conflict with gifts. The owner plaintiff, who claimed to be one of the shareholders in the house, filed a lawsuit to distribute the house and the applicant / defendant (in this case, the defendant) presented himself in court to prove his guilt. Had failed to present and, subsequently, a final order was issued in this case before the appellate court for divisional litigation rather than trial and trial for divisional litigation. In the case, after recording the evidence of the parties, the trial court filed a permanent injunction against the trial court's verdict and order. Or have Section 12 (2), under the PC at their request and reject the application as the trial court can order up to the Appellate Court and High Court. The Enforcement claimed that a permanent declaration and a permanent injunction were challenged to challenge the preliminary and final order passed in the division case and that its case could not be changed in the application under section 12 (2). Yes, the CPC's legal action was dismissed in favor of the plaintiff. Whenever there was a cause for action in this regard, the plaintiff could be resorted to, but the plaintiff, who could challenge the decree passed against him in the division case before the appellate court below, Filed Declaration immigration advocates from FR Kohat lawyer