Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR versus STATE

Railway Act 1890 Sections 126 and 128 of the Train Accident were deliberately operating, making mistakes and the negligence of the workmen The fault proof system available at the railway station was in good working condition and the telephone and micro wave communication with the railway stations on both sides. Was connected effectively. The accused participated in the 26 Down Train Act on Line No. 3 and was well aware that another Down Train was already standing at Railway Line No. 3, the station accused the train for the same line. After the accident, the accused also tried to manipulate the relevant records, which showed his guilty mind that the tail light on the line was not bright. The railway station's signal system is physically and mentally required to avoid any risk of accident involving the involvement of a check and counter check system suspect. But all it took was his frustration with his own actions and mistakes that could not simply be declared negligence, he made confessional statements, which in turn led to the accident, thus making him guilty. And the negligence of the perpetrators. The accused were kept in stable condition law firms from Hattian lawyer