Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus LARKANA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Sindh Local Government Ordinance 1979 Sections 108 and 113 ??? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 ??? Constitutional application ??? To maintain ??? Availability of alternative treatments ??? Ban against the use of constitutional jurisdiction ??? Who were the tenants under the applicant municipal authority? Did they challenge the constitutional petition to increase the rent of the houses under their tenancy? The revocation of the constitution petition was challenged by the Authority under Sections 108 and 113 of the Sindh Local Government Ordinance on the basis of the alternative being available to the applicants. , 1979? Validity? The availability of alternative remedies, no doubt, was not construed as an absolute precondition for the exercise of the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction and such jurisdiction may be exercised by the High Court in appropriate cases, but When a party intended to ignore the alternatives available to him under the same law, the first high for this party was to be satisfied? The court said that would not the available legislative and alternative alternatives be equally fair and effective treatment? Alternative remedies for applicants were equally appropriate and effective treatment under Sections 108 and 113, Sindh Local Government Ordinance 1979, but the applicant failed to offer any plausible explanation for non-profit. Same ??? Impact ??? Due to the availability of alternative methods to the applicants and also the reason why the constitutional application of the factual question filed by the applicants involved in the disputed queries was heard, was not intact. list of supreme court advocates from Kotmomin lawyer