HASSAN versus STATE
Under the Pakistan Penal Code Section 5 365A and accusations of defining evidencere evidence, the kidnappers did not pass a word before the trial court in their statements that they were either present at the time of the incident or their role in the abduction. Paid or the ransom money received by both alleged kidnappers, saying that the ransom money was received by the co-accused, in the circumstances, cannot be punished under section 6565A, PPC because of this None of the ingredients were ever lodged against the accused, nor were they accused of plotting a kidnapping. Nor was the accused charged against the accused. The complainant did not present any convincing explanation for the delay in the FIR prosecution's registration for almost two years and he was not shamed by any suspicion, conviction and punishment against the accused. Has failed miserably to prove the case beyond. , Was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Kashmore lawyer
