ATLAS KHAN versus ARSALA KHAN
Article 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to ban religious procession Binding a sect through an agreement which does not have a valid agreement between the district administration and a sect of religion under which the license Have to be removed. Religious procession was not approved by other sects of religion It is a fact that the grounds on which the procession had to go out were essentially grounds for refusing to grant licenses of occupation or disapproval to other sects. Was not where such a procession was intended. So it was not unusual, it was based on economic utility and it had to be raised for extraordinary purposes and purposes, the Authority gave some reasonable and good terms to the concerned but the absolute refusal was without legal authority to which it was not contracted. From which he was not a party to an agreement two or more different parties may not compel a third person to perform such terms in a contract in which he was not a third party
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from More kunda lawyer