SHAH MUHAMMAD versus SHAUKAT ALI
Civil Procedure Code Order XVII 0 XVII, R 3 Appellant Closed for CPC Habits There were numerous opportunities for defendant's evidence (appellant) to present his evidence but he failed to do so. The appellant had already submitted the costs necessary to summon the witness to the court. , The proof of the witness testimony was not closed to a civil servant, the request of the defendant (appellant) to review another witness was closed, although the defendant / appellant's conduct in the initial evidence was commendable. Were not, yet should have provided the appellant an opportunity to present his opportunity. The evidence on the day when the evidence of the witness was to be recorded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Kot Bunglow lawyer