Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN KHAN versus SARWAR JAN

Sections 17, 59, 60 and 61 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, VIII of the Interim Constitution Act of 1974 (Section VIII of 1974), although a registered document, is a registered document of the Maharaja Brave Impact of Sale Agreement. By no means was it contested. After being registered and implemented in 1986 (BK), its authenticity must be determined on the touchstone of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Registration Act 1977 (BK), which is applicable for transfer of immovable property. Was. Section 17 of the aforesaid Act provides that certain documents which were to be created, such as gift deadlines and sale deadlines, were required to be registered when any such document was registered by the Registration Officer with his signature. Was to issue the certificate on the said document and then the same documents were submitted. Maharaja Bahadur had to confirm his signature and date when the sub-registrar had put on his document, in response to his signature, he had to confirm that the document was contained in such documents. ent was admissible in evidence and it was proof that the document in question had been objected to in writing and upon completion of the document that in this case the document should have been sent to Maharaja Bahadur for his approval. As Section 61 (2), the Registration Act, 1977 (BK) was overturned on the ground that the provisions of section 61 (2) of the Act were not provided that without the approval of the Maharaja Bahadur, the document The evidence was not admissible, thus, the documents are admissible in evidence even though the same was not sent to Maharaja Bahadur for his signature. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Darya Khan lawyer