Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus STATE


The Customs Act 1969 section 156 (1) (8) was used in connection with the Control of Drug Substances Ordinance (VI 1995), Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9, which was charged in defining evidence that was a customs clearing and forwarding agent. I, he offered a shipping bill and admittedly did not present the case property to the customs authorities and therefore could not be considered to have a domain on a drug liability steel box and not a shipment agent or ship. The circumstances which compelled the trial court. There were speculations to prove the crime with the prosecuting agent, and on the basis of the misrepresentation of the evidence, the trial court acquitted the accused without discussing the available evidence against them and acquitted them in the available cases. Done.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Bolan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.