MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus STATE
The Customs Act 1969 section 156 (1) (8) was used in connection with the Control of Drug Substances Ordinance (VI 1995), Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9, which was charged in defining evidence that was a customs clearing and forwarding agent. I, he offered a shipping bill and admittedly did not present the case property to the customs authorities and therefore could not be considered to have a domain on a drug liability steel box and not a shipment agent or ship. The circumstances which compelled the trial court. There were speculations to prove the crime with the prosecuting agent, and on the basis of the misrepresentation of the evidence, the trial court acquitted the accused without discussing the available evidence against them and acquitted them in the available cases. Done.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Harnai lawyer
