Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY WORKS; GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus HISAMUL AHMAD

Civil Procedure Code Order XVIIA XVII of the CPC Habits, R 3 The non-presentation of the evidence to the court is evidence of the parties' default party closure even though the party was authorized to present their testimony on a specific date. Failure to present close evidence of the party, but where sufficient cause was presented so far, O XVII, R 3, with the permission and arbitration of the CPC, through the testimony of the delay and the provisions, the courts Before passing an order in a hurry, one must be very careful in passing the appropriate and legal order, giving the party a reasonable opportunity where the presiding officer In the absence of the head, the reader adjourned the case, it was necessary for the presiding officer to pass a new order and submit notice to the parties for further action, however, violating such an order to the presiding officer, O. XVII. Will justify passing the order under R 3, the Presiding Officer of the CPC did not give the relevant party the last and last chance to include his evidence, and to dismiss the requests for adjournment by state witnesses. The order to remove the evidence was not guaranteed, therefore, the trial court's affidavit was set aside and the trial was set aside. The trial court hearing was to provide an opportunity to add to the evidence of the victims, and after that, he decided to push the issue. advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer