MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus ADAM
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Bail bail was allowed by the Sessions Court on the ground that the FIR was non-breach. After a minor delay, it was not possible to identify the culprits after nightfall, and that the complainant, who suffered a lone wound on an unnecessary part of his body, filed the same order of the sessions court. Two people were charged for. He was not charged with guaranteeing the intervention of the High Court as unreasonable, fraudulent or misleading in that he dismissed his request for cancellation of bail by misusing the privileges of bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Quetta lawyer
