MUHAMMAD SOHAIL KHAN versus STATE
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860); Section 959595/2 382 Guarantee of the Complainant after his co-accused allegedly threatened with death with deadly weapons. In the light of the day in the house he committed the robbery with which he was armed, the share of the looted property was not recovered from it. According to Section 310 Cr, the statement of police personnel to the PC was not excluded. What could have been a good witness, just like any other person, unless there was a record presented to defame them as long as the testimony was deeply appreciated at the bailout stage? Was not valid The FIR entry clearly stated that conducting the identification test was not required by law, the accused was denied on bail conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Chowk Azam lawyer
