Find a Lawyer

FAZAL-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code section 302/307/148/149 praised the evidence which showed that it was a very close-range shot and that it was taken out with the intention of killing the victim. The second shot proved completely whatever was on the body part of the deceased and was usually enough to cause death. By nature, the ocular account contains the complainant and two injured witnesses, whose credibility could not be shaken even after a lengthy scrutiny, the motivation for the prosecutor's story was proven by the statement of a prosecutor who testified It was said that the accused and his co-accused have been the accused. Threatening that he will avenge his defeat in the election. nce; Proof of motive, but even more mutual that the accused was absconding for more than three years, there was evidence that the co-accused opened fire on a prosecution witness who prosecuted him against the accused and his accomplice. Killed in the trial. The accused proved beyond doubt, the appeal was dismissed because of the absence of imagination against the accused's conviction and conviction; the co-accused, who was described as a minor injury to the prosecutor's witness, was in jail since his arrest. The accused was sentenced as he had already passed and was ordered to be released soon. law websites from Khushab lawyer