Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD UMAR versus THE STATE

The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 section 10 (3) Proof of adultery The delay of about two months in filing the definition of evidence was properly stated by the prosecution's witnesses and also by this explanation. There was nothing on the record to deny it. Otherwise, the delay in reporting such incidents to the police was not trivial, especially in tribal societies where people were generally reluctant to report police-related issues to women and their In honor of the accused, there was no evidence against him except the statement. In the prosecution's case, no other evidence was available on record to prove the allegation because the defendant's argument was dismissed because the prosecution's statement alone would be sufficient to warrant conviction if it was affected by trust, otherwise It was not the number of witnesses, but in matters of quality and credibility, there was hardly any other witness who fell victim to himself because it rarely happened that such crime had taken place in the eyes of others or in public. Victim had given a clear testimony about the incident and was accused by the accused of committing an abusive act with him. Complainant's statement and the fact that she was pregnant and gave birth to a child, neither the accused girl has been accused of hostility nor has she been charged False allegations that the Victim girl has long been subjected to cross-examination, but there is nothing in her favor to harm the defense or the litigants. immigration advocates phone number from Karachi lawyer