Find a Lawyer

ROSHAN ALI MANGI versus SECRETARY, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Basic Rules F 9 (25) and 49 Special pay claims for public servants were posted as Joint Secretary (Rule I); another post of Joint Secretary (Rule II) was abolished. The assigned government employees were assigned to both the Regulations section (Regulations I and It) were merged and the government employee who had been working for more than 10 months as Joint Secretary (Regulations) with the authority in the account Requires payment of special pay in terms of Rule FR 9 (25). The request for additional work made by him was denied by the civil servant's request that the civil servant was not burdened with additional work by another wing, but merely redistribution of work led to a slight increase in employment. Did not justify the payment of special pay authority. The dispute was overturned because it was not merely a mere split of work, but rather a shift of the entire burden of Regulation Wing II to Regulation Wing I after the abolition of Regulation Wing II. Increase in work was an internal adjustment under which some additional burden of one job was divided in one or many positions, and thus the work was increased by a small percentage while the responsibility of the public servants was assigned to it. The case was raised 100% because no other duties had previously been granted a minor share in the minor circle, which was previously handled by Division Rule II. No such distribution but individual wing, transfer of full charge of public servant, entitled to special pay for a period of at least six months provided under F Rs. list of advocates from Thul lawyer