Find a Lawyer

FARIDA RAFIQUE GAYA versus HAMIDA KHATOON

Sections 42 and 54 of the lawsuit for residency and immunity for prosecution, obtained the membership of the Pakistan Defense Officers Housing Authority, which issued a transfer order in connection with the said plot in favor of the plaintiff, plotting the dispute. After the transfer, the plot was visited from time to time as she continued to enjoy her rights as the plaintiff's complaint of transfer of the plot was that in order to deprive the plaintiff, someone was subjected to a forgery and a fake national Identity card obtained and obtained on the basis of the same fake National Identity Card by the plaintiff's plot transfer fraudster The plaintiff alleges that he never entered into a contract for the sale of the plot in favor of the defendant, nor did he consider any of the defendant or any other person for the alleged transfer. Is gone As well as the National Identity Card, on which the defendant transferred the plot to H, his right was obtained by fraud by the plaintiff woman, who was not bound by the plaintiff and by the plaintiff. Despite repeated attempts to serve him directly at his address, he did not bother to appear before the plaintiff and fight the case, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the plaintiff established the right to plot in his case. And she was entitled to claim for the plaintiff that it was for the plaintiff to claim that she was guilty of plotting a dispute. The owner will be the owner and the defendant has no right, title or interest in it to protect and protect the right. Of the plaintiff, the defendant has any right, title or interest in the dispute solicitors from Naudero lawyer