KAUSAR PARVEEN versus ABDUL KHALID
Article 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule to Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was filed against the plaintiff / husband by the applicants / spouse for immediate rehabilitation and maintenance of the past. Respondents / Husband preferred appeal against restoration to the extent that the applicant / wife filed an appeal for recovery of Dwyer amount when Lower Appeal Court accepted the Respondent / Husband's appeal and Rejection of applicant / wife Legal excuse for the wife to deprive her husband of her marital status, such question will be removed The conclusion is necessary and it was not considered by the two subordinate courts in the Family Court's quest for past care, the lower appellate court upset without considering the evidence by both. Applicants / spouses determined by the High Courts and the law were deemed not to be considered by the lower appellate court in its original context, setting aside the red appellate court decisions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Hala lawyer