Find a Lawyer

PASAND SHAH versus STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 Testimony of Evidence The presence of witnesses at this event was extremely doubtful, failing to prove the location of the prosecution's failure to prove that an FIR was not filed in those circumstances and at that time The premise of the prosecution's case is that the accused came to the party on the spot armed with a firearm, which showed great enthusiasm for teaching the accused. Police and the trial court denied police witnesses who had not succeeded in the presence and involvement of the two co-accused. Challenged by the complaining party, which shows that eyewitnesses have made false or malicious accusations, the motion by the prosecution-based court was rightly denied and said that the superior Was not challenged by the complaining party through a review request before. The retrieval of the rifle from the court accused was legally unforgivable as no crime was recovered from the PK because of the fact that eye-eyed witnesses were denied linking the said rifle to the commission of the crime. Yes, medical evidence had lost all its identifying value because it could not identify or identify the assailant who injured the victim with legal requirements. The statement that the deceased has not been fulfilled by the prosecutor, cannot be acknowledged as a dying declaration, the same cannot be acknowledged as a dying statement that cannot be freely given in any quarter Unconfirmed or unconfirmed, ocular testimony, no confidence-boosting circumstances jobs for fresh advocates from Tharo Shah lawyer