Find a Lawyer

SHER REHMAN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497/498 Sentencing Code (XLV of 1860), Section 382/34 Guarantee, the accused's grant was arrested at odd hours while sitting in a stolen / stolen car. It was assumed that no private individuals were created. Recovery counselors were in power because it was virtually impossible to get private attendance at night because the observational evidence of a policeman could not be neglected at this stage because the policeman was as good a witness as any. To another. Unless and until the evidence was brought on record to deny it, the alleged delay in filing the FIR after their arrest was sufficiently explained, voluntarily led by the police and The location of the incident was identified from where he had taken the complainant's nephew along with the stolen car. , Prime fax, is a strong piece of evidence against the accused. It was alleged that they had not committed any offense under Section 382/34, PPC. Ed, under the circumstances, the Joint Counselor prepared by the police did not face any legal weakness as both the accused were not arrested separately or separately at different times, but they were arrested at the same time. Was gone and in the stolen car they were going to ask about the disappearance. Explaining the characteristic features of the accused in the FIR or conducting an identity parade would be akin to deep appreciation or evaluation of evidence that was not allowed by the Tender Law at the bailout stage in the context that the names of the accused were transferred to the FIR. They were not property advocates from Mangowal lawyer