Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus BENAZIR BHUTTO

Sections 3, 4, 5, 9 and 10 of the Criminal Code (CR PC), Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), sections 476 and 265K show the definition of record of evidence of criminal cases relating to corrupt and corrupt practices. That a hand-picked company was contracted out. Was awarded by the accused (former Prime Minister), not by the Cabinet or any of its committees. The meeting in front of the committee / cabinet was just a blink of an eye and the only points of discussion that came up with the presentation, as well as in their meetings with the relevant authorities, were about the fees and contract terms and grants. The agreement was never the subject of any action or meeting or offer. Approval of the contract was a violation of relevant laws. No tender was ever sought for approval of the contract and the contract was given to the handicapping company. The agreement was approved despite opposition from the previous opinion of the President of Pakistan, the Finance Division and even the Department of Revenue. The co-accused (former prime minister's husband) had shown great interest in the work of the hand-operated company and chaired government meetings about the company, despite the fact that he had no authority in that regard. The accused (former) prime minister, unlawfully and in misappropriation of his position and violating the laws and highlighting such agreement, showed that the sole purpose of the award of the contract. It was that in exchange for the approval of such an agreement, the commission and the kickbacks were paid by the handpicked company such kickbacks and commissions. The accused (former prime minister) received in the accounts of another company pakistani advocates Kot Radha Kishan lawyer