Find a Lawyer

DIRECTOR-GENERAL, NATIONAL LOGISTIC CELL, RAWALPIND versus I MUHKAM-DIN

Service Tribunal (Regulation) Rules 1974 R 22 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908) Section 12 (2) Application for cancellation and cancellation of service tribunal decision / decision under section 12 (2), section 12 (c) 2) Request for retention under the PC (2), the CPC could only be sustained if the order or decision from the judicial forum was made by a party to hide the facts related to any misrepresentation or fraud or jurisdiction. Was obtained, neither the decision was made as a result of the fact or misinterpretation of the law by either party, nor was the decision taken by the judicial forum from any party. . There was no fraud or printing on the tribunal that was available under any law other than correction of typographical or math errors under R22, Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), 1974 for review of the decision to review. ? The service tribunal's jurisdiction has been lacking and the independent mind and interpretation resulted in a 1 time decision o f the application under the legal provisions, section 12 (2), against the decision of the service tribunal. In the case of a complaint, the appeal was available before the Supreme Court under Section 12 (2) CPC for the decision of the service tribunal to be reversed. In this way, the misunderstanding was wrong, wrong, wrong and incompetent lawer from fb area from Gujrat lawyer