Find a Lawyer

MAHDI HASSAN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 302/324/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 202 and 439 of the trial were not prosecuted by the trial court, preliminary under Case 202. Following the investigation, the CRPC summoned all the accused, including the accused, who had already been found guilty by Investigation Officers in their respective investigations. It was argued that the aforesaid trial court had to investigate the investigating officers or at least go to the case diaries. Before investigating the accused in section 202, the CCP requested the court to record the evidence of the witnesses submitted by the complainant and then to the complainants Criminals form their own opinion about crime. The theory of the investigating officers or the landowner at such a stage may not be logical because the complainant preferred P. In addition, after feeling distressed over the police's antagonistic attitude, the investigating officers made their own inquiry. Can give evidence of their opinion which would be an unacceptable complaint along with their own statement in which the statements of the four witnesses were recorded. In addition to medical evidence, it was not necessary for the trial court to examine the police file before proceeding to preserve the accused's presence, which could have presented its evidence in defense during the trial, the trial court said. The order summoned all the accused to stand trial. Request for review without any interference or weakness of any kind famous supreme court advocate from Wahi hassain lawyer