Find a Lawyer

HIDAYAT KHATOON versus STATE

Special Leave to Appeal to the High Court for Special Outreach to Appeal Against the Complainant Who Went Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 417 (2) of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/109/148/149 Did not inquire about his request for. Months later, it was unreliable that he could not find the objection to the petition filed by the High Court office for such a delay until after 24 days after submitting the application from the office. Dismissed without charge. Any clarification which was interrupted and he did not file a petition for condolence was delayed by the complainant (the applicant) for more than the appointed time of the High Court office, therefore, neither could be excluded. Nor can it be included in the extent to which, in the case of computing, to the extent of filing an appeal, otherwise, only one of the accused initially mentioned in the case was referred to by the sessions court. The source was acquitted. The T (petitioner) neither himself nor his witnesses subsequently included the other accused in the complaint filed by them and in the same case by the magistrate under section 202 of the Investigating Officer. Before any of the Investigation Officers submitted the report, the CRPC also revealed that the appeal filed by the complainant was a deliberate request for special leave, therefore, with the restriction. As well as facts were banned female advocates from Kohat lawyer