Find a Lawyer

AZRA PARVEEN versus SARDAR KHAN

The appeal against the possibility that the Pakistan Penal Code Section 342 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) could not be acquitted cannot be ruled out by examining the interested witnesses in this case. The response was taken. There were also witnesses in the civil suit prosecution who were unsupported by an independent witness in the locality, but it was widely suspected that the prosecution had failed to present a lock placed by the suspect at the door of the inn. , Nor did any witness support the prosecution's version, except for the complainant, the door of caution was closed by the accused in his presence; the sessions court correctly saw that the prisoner could But there is no restriction on the part of the complainant if he wishes to proceed in any direction. They were, therefore, lost in order to attract the punishment provided for the offense that was sought by TT for acquittal. They did not face any unlawful interference with the sessions court. Appeal against the accused's verdict was dismissed in the circumstances top civil advocates from Sanghi lawyer