PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MARHABA DAWAKHANA REGD., LAHORE
In connection with the sale of the Stamp Act 1899 section 27 land, stamp duty was determined on a stamp paper based on the value of the sale cell, but the sub-registrar refused to register for the same reason. Should have prepared a contract. The price set by the stamp paper and the collector on the basis of the price of the property listed by the Collector Value Table was to be notified by publication in the Official Gazette, but not by section 27 of the Stamp Act 1899 No notification was issued under the AA nor was the pricing table ever notified in the Sub-Registrar's Official Gazette Demand that for payment of additional stamps at the rate allegedly set by the collector, As such, the law is unnecessary, especially when the sale price of the land disputed by the parties in the celibacy Was accepted. Court for the specific performance of the contract
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
