Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH VIRK versus NAZIR AHMAD

Consistency of section & 63 & Election 62 Election Petition Section of under, Non-violation of notification under Representative People Act, 1976, Election request filed by unsuccessful candidate, was challenged by various application in which it was alleged The names of the witnesses and their statements were statements. Their petition has not been filed by the applicant. The applicant / retired candidate had requested that the application should be dismissed at an early stage without proceeding as the applicant must comply with the provisions of section 63 of the Representation Act 1976. Terms were not complied with. The selection of Section 62 of the Public Representation Act, 1976 was fatal to an election petition if the applicant violated it, even if the notification issued under Section 62 of the Representation People Act 1976 was also violated. Then it would not be an election request. According to the People's Act, 1976, affected by the provisions of Section 63 of the House of Representatives, there was only one provision whereby a decision issued under section 62 of the Public Representation Act, 1976 was passed during the trial before the final decision. Could be excluded, although this is a by-law, but it did not result. In the event of a dismissal of an election request, the electoral request for non-compliance with this procedure, thus, cannot be dismissed prior to the final decision being passed in violation of the notification. jobs for fresh advocates from Lasbela lawyer