NEELAM TEXTILE MILLS versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN
The payment of Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Application State / Authority, as per the Scheme Act 1973, was required to treat each body equally, in terms of granting privileges as well as imposing dues. Unable to do so, their process of imposing penalties on the applicant / exporter did not suffer prejudice and was not responsible for the violation of the fundamental rights of the guarantor under Article 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan. The order was declared illegal by the High Court. In exercising its constitutional jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
