MATIARI SUGAR MILLS versus GOVT. OF SINDH
Sindh Agricultural Products Market Act 1939 Sections 4, 6 and 9 Sindh Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1940, R29 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Market on Fees purchased from Sugar Mill through Market Fees imposed by Market Fees. It was alleged by the committee, the mill, that no service was offered by the market committee and stated that the committee should be in accordance with the amount of services provided by the law. The fees levied under should be proportional to the benefits currently accrued. No person was paid the same payment data on the record to indicate that such fees were grossly forfeited or forfeited. In the absence of any data which indicates that the market committee is charging the market rate at any rate beyond or beyond its legitimate requirement. The services offered by it in the relevant area, the order to collect market fees; the exercise of the constitutional jurisdiction cannot be interfered with by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Mingora lawyer