Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IKRAM versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302 / Sen 34 Punishment The torture witnesses, who provided consistent and coherent details of the incident, were examined, and the rehabilitation witness's testimony was substantiated by inadmissible testimony, medical evidence is not evidence of the prosecution's testimony. ? The statements of the prosecution's witnesses were found to be credible, their evidence could not be denied. In the event that the accused was convicted, the prosecutor's witness himself confessed that the defendant and the victim were on loan money. Conflict has arisen when he demanded the money back from the deceased, the accused had quarreled and quarreled and on that occasion the accused also abused the accused, the accused, who was young and young, borrowed. The refusal to return and being late would have made me very angry at Late's behavior. The abuser received abuses from the late and the return of his money would make such an accused accused of easing the issue of punishment and justice abolished if his death sentence was converted to life imprisonment. The death sentence was changed to life imprisonment attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mamu kunjan lawyer