Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SAJIDA PARVEEN versus S.H.O


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Section 364 Police Rules, 1934, this 25 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application by the magistrate to deny all the accused in the case by reasonable reasoning means that not only all the accused are discharged Was granted, but the FIR has also been canceled, so a re-investigation of the matter could not be done without the permission of the Magistrate and the police could not go to the applicant's house and ask for the evacuees. Was. The accused, accused of being involved in the investigation under 825 per cent of the Police Rules 1934, were consequently barred from proceeding in this case without proper legal procedure against the applicant and his relatives.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.