ALLAH BACHAYO versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 540 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/504/34 Recovery of a Prosecutor's Witness for Further Investigation In a courtroom rush and without waiting for the accused's lawyer The appointment of a lawyer as a lawyer was not only prejudice to the prosecution's testimony on the witness who examined the lawyer in the case in which the defendant and the co-accused defended were different and contradictory to each other. In fact, their defense trial was also damaged. Either the case should have been postponed to a shorter date or another independent senior lawyer should be appointed to obtain appropriate instructions for the accused and to provide adequate time for preparation of the case, the sessions court ruled that through the accused The request to revoke the testimony of the prosecutor should be dismissed. Further cross-examination was against the law and the principles of natural justice were seriously prejudiced in their cases, resulting in the trial court's order to investigate the testimony of the aforesaid prosecutor. A defense restraining order was already set up for cross-examination by the lawyer appointed by the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Jalozai lawyer