NAZEER AHMED DHOON versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Assistant Appointment and Appointment of Government Employees Before the High Court Regularly Before the High Court, Sindh Public Service Commission Promotes Rules 1990 RR 3 and 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Appointments to Public Employees Challenged in his constitutional application. Instead of an ad hoc basis, claiming that the appointments and promotions of public servants should be made by the Sindh Public Service Commission, the arrest of the public servant was dismissed by the High Court and the constitutional application was rejected with observations that Sindh. R5 of the Public Service Commission (Rules 1990) empowered the Chief Minister in the public interest to specify the positions which could be filled without reference to the Public Service Commission and in the case of opposition to public servants, the Chief Minister made the above rules. Given the powers and removed the positions of assistant commissioners. The leave to appeal without the commission's accuracy was upheld by the Supreme Court in relation to only those civil servants who were directly involved without scrutiny without the provincial Public Service Commission process. The favor of the High Court was in accordance with the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kala Bagh lawyer