Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947 (XLV of 1860), section 161 was not illegally received by the complainant in the definition of evidence as to the question of whether the fraudulent money was sold. Was being considered, the complainant was not taken while he was being examined in the trial court for sale, thus, it was considered and the confidence was not encouraged once the corruption The charge was proved. Reasonable suspicion cannot be given the benefit of technicalities because technical items can thwart the process of justice because the money recovered from the accused was illegally received, the case against the accused proved. The accused were sentenced by the trial court in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
