GHULAM FARID versus STATE
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 161 did not receive a bribe from the accused who suffered an FIR for a three-year explicitly flawed delay. Contains ocular evidence containing material contradictions and contradictions. The purpose of paying the time, the mood, and the happiness of the accused, who was the patwari, could not do any favorable to the testimony of the complainant and the other prosecution, who confessed that there was no owner of the land when the prosecution witness was an interested witness. Could not depend on the accused was acquitted. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates FR Kohat lawyer
