Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA

When the case was adjourned on the next date of hearing for the submission of Zarim Shamim for submission to the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 Section 24 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant Assom, Failure Trial Court. Yes, the trial court found out about this error, and it issued a ruling for depositing such money. Subsequent orders were not conveyed to the former ambassador / applicant. The order to submit the gold was approved by the trial court after its expiration. The amount was deposited for 30 days against the provisions of section 24 of the Pre-Impression Act, 1991, however the respondent / vendor preferred to amend the lower appellate court against such submission order and accepted the amendment. While the trial was held by the lower appellate court, it was not the particular fault / failure of the petitioner / pre-emptor or his lawyer, but it was the trial court's record that did not prove it. That the trial court had drawn. petition. Applicant / Permitter's attention to the order after depositing the gold, and it was required to comply with the same clause under section 24 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 and to enforce and punish it. The applicant / pre-emptor, rejecting his claim, had to take into account that the applicant / pre-emptor had to comply with the order passed by the court under section 24 (1) of the Act due to the gross negligence of the court / its scholars. Failed to comply. The appropriate advertisement was not approved under section 24 (1) of the Act, so it was not complied with by the applicants / offers. Lower api tax advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer