Find a Lawyer

MARK MIFSUD MRS. ROSEMARIE MORLEY versus INVESTIGATING OFFICER, CUSTOMS

Control of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, Sections 403 and 235 (2) of the 1997 Act, section 156 (1) (8) of the Narcotic Substances Act XXXV 1997), Section 9 (c) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 13 Once a crime has been proved or acquitted, to prosecute for that same offense a double sentence and a question of protection against self-abuse, determine whether the offense is one or two separately. A crime is a test where an act or waiver proves to be a crime under two or more acts, the offender can be punished under either of them, but will not be punished twice for the same offense, although different This is explained in the manner in which the accused persons were trying to expel the Pakistani heroin powder, their cases were fully covered under Section 156 (1) (8) of the Customs Act, 1969. Arrested at the airport, they could not be prosecuted for the same offense under the provisions of the Narcotic Substance Act 1997. Other drug-related laws that violated the dual-risk rule could not register a second case against the accused on the basis of the power of investigation, facts, evidence and recovery, including forgery and duplication of forgery. Was forbidden. advocates from Kalaswala lawyer