W.A.P.D.A versus CHINA INTERNATIONAL WATER AND ELECTRIC CORPN.
Arbitration Act 1940 Sections 20, 39 and 41 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 151 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Request for the arbitration agreement to be entered in the Court of Appeal Procedure and the Court retains intra-court appeal The arbitrator was appointed by the arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties and the local commissioner. The single judge of the high court was also appointed by the court to report the work on the site so that the former local commissioner. The appointment was not objected to by any of the parties, but when the earlier local commissioner refused to accept the assignment, the High Corps Single judge has approved a Local Commissioner appointed appellant, PC application under section 151 of the Local Commissioner to seek review of the order of appointment and rejected the single judge. The High Court was under section 4I of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and cannot be ignored under section 39 of the Arbitration Act. The order approved under the provisions of the Arbitration Act for the appointment of a local commissioner was not valid through a petition under section 151, CPC, where the earlier appointment of a local commissioner by the appellant was not objected to and The matter was already sent. The sole arbitrator, the intra-court appeal, was not enforceable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Darya Khan lawyer