ZEENAT BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN
Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961 Section 5 Dover Kabinama claims as security for Dover plaintiff claiming to own property in lieu of money for his house, trial court decides plaintiff's case while appellate court In the same legal case, the trial court erred in dealing with the cabinet. Plaintiff contends that in the name of the plaintiff, the document in the title of transfer of title to the house, according to the confession, that when the executor of the house was executed, he was not the owner of the real estate house, therefore, no such The document was not processed by it, however, the House was not, however, exclusively owned by the defendant's father when the documents in question were written; in fact, the plaintiff only paid security or dock money. Was granted bail, but was never tried to transfer the same to the plaintiff. At the time of the marriage, the appellate court had erroneously concluded that the authenticity of the document was vague, as was the statement of the handwriting expert and the minor witnesses. The amount of Dwarf in the cabinet contained was guaranteed, and through the documents it was questioned that Pentiff had agreed only to Dwyer's money and mentioned that he was a lender. , The plaintiff immediately became entitled to the payment of the dissolution of the marriage and he was entitled to retain his possession of the property till then. Wiggy until his Dover claim is fulfilled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kakul lawyer